MTR verification for pressure vessels, boilers, and piping systems.
Fabricators, owner-operators, and Authorized Inspectors working to ASME BPVC and ASTM material specifications. Every heat number validated against code requirements before welding starts.
The problems MTR.AI solves for pressure equipment.
Every industry has its own set of specification complexity, regulatory pressure, and documentation volume. These are the challenges we hear from quality engineers in your sector.
Code edition tracking
ASME BPVC references specific ASTM editions. SA-516 is not identical to A516 — supplementary requirements and acceptance criteria differ between code editions. Your MTR review must match the edition cited on the design drawing.
Impact test requirements
Charpy impact testing requirements vary by material thickness, minimum design metal temperature, and exemption curves per UCS-66. A single missed exemption check can hold up an entire vessel.
Multi-supplier coordination
A single pressure vessel may source plate, forgings, fittings, and pipe from different mills. Each MTR format is different. Each must be verified against the correct specification and purchase order.
AI stamp accountability
The Authorized Inspector reviews material documentation as part of the ASME certification process. Incomplete or non-conforming MTRs discovered during audit create rework, schedule delays, and potential R-stamp findings.
Standards built into the verification engine.
MTR.AI's specification engine includes the full requirements tables for these standards — chemical composition limits, mechanical property minimums, supplementary requirements, and heat treatment conditions. Not a lookup table. The actual acceptance criteria, encoded and version-tracked.
Request early access for pressure equipment
We're onboarding early partners across pressure equipment. If your team reviews MTRs against ASME BPVC Section II or ASTM A516, let's talk.